IU Indianapolis faculty might use the Scholarly Teaching Taxonomy in a number of ways as they pursue their various roles in the academic community.
Individual Reflection
Individual instructors might use the taxonomy
- To chart a pathway for a teaching career
- To act as a concept map for valued teaching practice
- To shape goal setting and decision-making in a teaching practice
- To open and shape a conversation with a mentor or chair
- To engage in a guided exploration of a heretofore unfamiliar area of teaching practice
- To structure a teaching portfolio or other types of advancement documentation (e.g., FAR, 3-year review, P&T)
- To establish shared concepts and values as part of a formative peer review
Collegial Conversations
Participants in the conversation about teaching and learning at IU Indianapolis might use the taxonomy
- To guide discussions about course and curriculum development in committees, task forces, and program reviews
- To shape discussions about new areas of teaching practice
- To identify aspects of teaching practice to use as evidence of success and so diminish the impact of student evaluations of teaching
- To make scholarly teaching more transparent and so enable more effective reviews and evaluations
- To advance learner-centered teaching
Administrative Perspectives
Faculty and administrators engaged in and responsible for appointment and advancement processes might use the taxonomy
- To frame and provide context for documenting teaching success
- To inform the formulation and revision of guidelines for advancement, teaching awards, and/or teaching recognition (e.g., FACET)
- To enhance the perspectives of reviewers of teaching portfolios
- To provide specifics to illuminate current guidelines.